22Jan
Superior Court CCLD Awards Sanctions For Unprepared Rule 30(b)(6) Deponent
Fortis Advisors, LLC v. Dematic Corp., C.A. No. N18C-12-104 AML [CCLD] (Del. Super. Nov. 18, 2020) - As this decision illustrates, Delaware trial courts have a variety of sanction options available when it comes to violations of court orders or discovery rules, such as the failure to adequately prepare a Rule 30(b)(6) deponent....
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
On December 30, 2019, a federal District Court issued a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) against th...
Read More >
COVID-19 has created a severe disruption to the construction industry. Certain jurisdictions, includ...
Read More >
On June 13, 2019, the U.S. Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor and the Treasury issued f...
Read More >
Taking a three-year look back at the Supreme Court’s workplace law decisions gives you the sense th...
Read More >
On January 21, 2020, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) released guidance for tax-exempt organizatio...
Read More >
In August 2013, Arkansas enacted a statute intended to regulate employers’ ability to access social...
Read More >