22Jan
Superior Court CCLD Awards Sanctions For Unprepared Rule 30(b)(6) Deponent
Fortis Advisors, LLC v. Dematic Corp., C.A. No. N18C-12-104 AML [CCLD] (Del. Super. Nov. 18, 2020) - As this decision illustrates, Delaware trial courts have a variety of sanction options available when it comes to violations of court orders or discovery rules, such as the failure to adequately prepare a Rule 30(b)(6) deponent....
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
The California Consumer Privacy Act (the CCPA), effective January 1, 2020, defines sweeping new priv...
Read More >
The SCCE Internal Investigations Workshop provides two days of focused training on conducting compli...
Read More >
A Pennsylvania state court held that the state’s Medical Marijuana Act creates a private right of a...
Read More >
Policing hospital mergers has become a top enforcement priority among federal antitrust enforcers. I...
Read More >
A Hollywood union’s recent amendments to its union rules has sparked federal antitrust lawsuits by ...
Read More >
Once a month, we cover an interesting topic with a short video. This month, Associate Sarah Beth Bar...
Read More >