22Jan
Superior Court CCLD Awards Sanctions For Unprepared Rule 30(b)(6) Deponent
Fortis Advisors, LLC v. Dematic Corp., C.A. No. N18C-12-104 AML [CCLD] (Del. Super. Nov. 18, 2020) - As this decision illustrates, Delaware trial courts have a variety of sanction options available when it comes to violations of court orders or discovery rules, such as the failure to adequately prepare a Rule 30(b)(6) deponent....
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
The SECURE Act, signed into law on Dec. 20, 2019, contains various provisions that may impact large ...
Read More >
For nearly 25 years, courts in the Ninth Circuit have consistently refused to sanction nonconsensual...
Read More >
Maryland employers can expect some big changes to the State’s workplace harassment laws which will ...
Read More >
There is a lot of confusion about how the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) will impact Califor...
Read More >
CONVERGE19 is in its 4th year of bringing together the world’s leading companies for 2 days of dyna...
Read More >
It can take almost a lifetime to build a sterling reputation in the retirement plan industry as a pl...
Read More >