22Jan
Superior Court CCLD Awards Sanctions For Unprepared Rule 30(b)(6) Deponent
Fortis Advisors, LLC v. Dematic Corp., C.A. No. N18C-12-104 AML [CCLD] (Del. Super. Nov. 18, 2020) - As this decision illustrates, Delaware trial courts have a variety of sanction options available when it comes to violations of court orders or discovery rules, such as the failure to adequately prepare a Rule 30(b)(6) deponent....
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
In a recent publication, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) Staff shares some...
Read More >
On September 1, 2020, the Orange County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) voted unanimously to app...
Read More >
We are pleased to provide you with the third annual installment of our Life Sciences and Health Care...
Read More >
On November 20, 2019, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that the fluctuating workweek (“FWW”) m...
Read More >
Approximately four years ago, during the Obama Administration, the National Labor Relations Board up...
Read More >
M&A is nothing new to the cannabis sector. The industry has experienced substantial consolidation ac...
Read More >