22Jan
Superior Court CCLD Awards Sanctions For Unprepared Rule 30(b)(6) Deponent
Fortis Advisors, LLC v. Dematic Corp., C.A. No. N18C-12-104 AML [CCLD] (Del. Super. Nov. 18, 2020) - As this decision illustrates, Delaware trial courts have a variety of sanction options available when it comes to violations of court orders or discovery rules, such as the failure to adequately prepare a Rule 30(b)(6) deponent....
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
Ninth Circuit Clarifies Joint Employer Classification - McDonald’s was not a joint employer of its...
Read More >
As our economy’s uptick continues to favor buyers, developers often find large parcels of contiguou...
Read More >
Through the Supreme Decree N° 014-2019-MIMP, the Ministry of Women and Vulnerable Populations has re...
Read More >
The COVID-19 pandemic is having a profound impact on construction projects across Canada causing del...
Read More >
Thinking of denying a medical bill in a Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation claim for not being “ca...
Read More >
California Governor Gavin Newsom just signed AB 51 into law, which means that effective January 1, 2...
Read More >