22Jan
Superior Court CCLD Awards Sanctions For Unprepared Rule 30(b)(6) Deponent
Fortis Advisors, LLC v. Dematic Corp., C.A. No. N18C-12-104 AML [CCLD] (Del. Super. Nov. 18, 2020) - As this decision illustrates, Delaware trial courts have a variety of sanction options available when it comes to violations of court orders or discovery rules, such as the failure to adequately prepare a Rule 30(b)(6) deponent....
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
AB 5 (Codifies the “ABC” Test for Contractor Status) - AB 5 codifies the “ABC” Test for determi...
Read More >
Delaware Supreme Court reinstates case alleging fiduciary breach for failure to disclose CEO’s post...
Read More >
The SHIELD Act will impose substantial new obligations on any employer with an employee residing in ...
Read More >
In November 2019, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court looked at the conflict between federal and state la...
Read More >
In today’s edition of Daily Compliance News: 1. More Alstom indictments. (FCPA Blog) 2. Another se...
Read More >
In this episode of Life with GDPR, Jonathan Armstrong and Tom Fox are back to discuss the role of ve...
Read More >