22Jan
Superior Court CCLD Awards Sanctions For Unprepared Rule 30(b)(6) Deponent
Fortis Advisors, LLC v. Dematic Corp., C.A. No. N18C-12-104 AML [CCLD] (Del. Super. Nov. 18, 2020) - As this decision illustrates, Delaware trial courts have a variety of sanction options available when it comes to violations of court orders or discovery rules, such as the failure to adequately prepare a Rule 30(b)(6) deponent....
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
The U.S. agencies in charge of issuing guidance under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act...
Read More >
You expect your insurance carrier to provide coverage when a claim is made against your company. How...
Read More >
On December 20, 2019, the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement Act (“SECURE Act”)...
Read More >
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on February 26, 2020 that ERISA plaintiffs do not gain “actual knowled...
Read More >
The UK government’s actions are ramping up as it battles to contain the spread of COVID-19 and enfo...
Read More >
After an initial delay, payroll and wage withholdings to fund the Massachusetts paid family and medi...
Read More >