22Jan
Superior Court CCLD Awards Sanctions For Unprepared Rule 30(b)(6) Deponent
Fortis Advisors, LLC v. Dematic Corp., C.A. No. N18C-12-104 AML [CCLD] (Del. Super. Nov. 18, 2020) - As this decision illustrates, Delaware trial courts have a variety of sanction options available when it comes to violations of court orders or discovery rules, such as the failure to adequately prepare a Rule 30(b)(6) deponent....
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
In response to complaints from the trucking industry, on August 14 the federal Department of Transpo...
Read More >
As part of our ongoing series on the SECURE Act, this post discusses two key changes affecting defin...
Read More >
The National Labor Relations Board’s landmark Boeing Co. decision set a new legal standard for dete...
Read More >
Client issues often arrive like schools of fish – rapidly and in huge numbers. Sometimes this is th...
Read More >
On September 3, 2020, the U.S. Department of Justice’s (DOJ) Antitrust Division (the Division) publ...
Read More >
Former PG&E lawyer named new regional EPA chief in California - Los Angeles Times – February 11 -...
Read More >