13Jan
U. S. Supreme Court to Consider Article III Standing for Absent Class Members in Review of Ninth Circuit Decision
The United States Supreme Court has again granted a petition to examine standing in the context of class actions, specifically whether Article III of the Constitution permits members of a certified class to recover money damages when members of the certified class suffered no actual injury. This issue was presented to the Supreme Court after the Ninth Circuit issued an opinion and order in Ramirez v. TransUnion LLC, 951 F.3d 1008 (9th Cir. 2020), finding absent class members in a class action...
By:
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Related
On March 31, 2020, Gov. Baker revised the list of “essential” services in Massachusetts. The revis...
Read More >
The legal definition of “workplace accidents” under French law does not normally make global headl...
Read More >
This summer brought typical thunderstorms, but it also brought a shower of new and changed requireme...
Read More >
On Friday, May 1, 2020, the Trump administration issued an executive order prohibiting the acquisiti...
Read More >
The Bank of New York Mellon v. Barber, Case No. 1D18-2097 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020). A trial judge may not...
Read More >
Adverse economic or social conditions have not historically tended to affect the general application...
Read More >