01Dec
Enka v Chubb: The Nuanced Presumptions "Test" on the Law of Arbitration Agreements
The United Kingdom Supreme Court in Enka Insaat Ve Sanayi AS v OOO Insurance Company Chubb has now resolved the question: which system of national law governs the validity and scope of an arbitration agreement when the law applicable to the contract containing it differs from the law of the seat of the arbitration? Will it be the law governing the contract; the law governing the procedure (the law of the seat); or another system of national law altogether? Noting that this issue “has long...
By:
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
Related
More than a decade ago in the seminal case Gantler v. Stephens, the Delaware Supreme Court clarified...
Read More >
Currently, certain employers are required under federal law to file annual Employer Information Repo...
Read More >
Seyfarth Summary: Like the singers in “California Dreamin,” many out-of-state employers—on a wint...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: The Trump Administration has succeeded in replacing several open positions withi...
Read More >
On November 20, 2019, the Supreme Court of California announced it would review and decide whether i...
Read More >
The United Kingdom is taking a careful look at potential direct investments by foreign entities. Whi...
Read More >