03Sep
Mining Companies: Don’t Let Your QP Refuse to Provide Required SEC Consents
We are seeing a significant increase in cases where a qualified person (QP) or related engineering firm has prepared a technical report or other required disclosure for a mining company, but then resisted, or outright refused, to provide the written consent that the mining company is required to obtain in order to be permitted to disclose the name of the QP and the conclusions of the QP in a prospectus that forms part of an SEC registration statement for a public offering or for the mining...
By:
Dorsey & Whitney LLP
Related
On Thursday, November 14, 2019, the Oregon Court of Appeals released its decision in Maza v. Waterfo...
Read More >
On July 11, 2018, New York State enacted a sweeping new law aimed at combatting sexual harassment in...
Read More >
As its session draws to a close, the New York State Legislature substantially revised the state’s a...
Read More >
In Simpson v. Temple University, et al., the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsyl...
Read More >
The guidance includes a refresher on “failing firm” defence claims, for which the CMA will maintai...
Read More >
WLG's International Corporate Transactions and Restructuring & Insolvency Resolutions groups review ...
Read More >