21Aug
Eleventh Circuit Affirms “Exceptional Case” Ruling: Insurer Had No Duty to Defend Construction Debris Claim Where Amended Complaint Omitted Crucial Fact Implicating Pollution Exclusion
Eleventh Circuit Affirms “Exceptional Case” Ruling: Insurer Had No Duty to Defend Construction Debris Claim Where Amended Complaint Omitted Crucial Fact Implicating Pollution Exclusion The Eleventh Circuit, affirming the district court’s departure from Florida’s four corners rule, held that a pollution exclusion barred coverage for a bodily injury claim arising from exposure to construction debris, even though the operative pleading on its face stated a claim within coverage. The court applied...
By:
Rivkin Radler LLP
Related
A Trending News interview from Employment Law This Week®, featuring attorney Robert O’Hara, Member ...
Read More >
In a June 14, 2019 decision, the National Labor Relations Board clarified whether an employer may li...
Read More >
While many construction projects are advancing in a safe manner during the COVID-19 pandemic, some h...
Read More >
Dittman v. UPMC, 196 A.3d 1036 (Pa. 2018). The Pennsylvania Supreme Court holds that employers have...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: The Cal/OSH Standards Board will vote this week on a proposed standard requiring...
Read More >
Earlier today the Washington Supreme Court issued its highly-anticipated decision in Keodalah v. All...
Read More >