21Aug
Eleventh Circuit Affirms “Exceptional Case” Ruling: Insurer Had No Duty to Defend Construction Debris Claim Where Amended Complaint Omitted Crucial Fact Implicating Pollution Exclusion
Eleventh Circuit Affirms “Exceptional Case” Ruling: Insurer Had No Duty to Defend Construction Debris Claim Where Amended Complaint Omitted Crucial Fact Implicating Pollution Exclusion The Eleventh Circuit, affirming the district court’s departure from Florida’s four corners rule, held that a pollution exclusion barred coverage for a bodily injury claim arising from exposure to construction debris, even though the operative pleading on its face stated a claim within coverage. The court applied...
By:
Rivkin Radler LLP
Related
In Velox Express, Inc., 368 NLRB No. 61 (2019), the National Labor Relations Board ruled that miscla...
Read More >
Winger Contr. Co. v. Cargill, Inc., No. 17-1169, 2019 BL 132092 (Iowa Apr. 12, 2019). On April 12, ...
Read More >
On October 12, 2020, in Travelport Ltd & Ors v WEX Inc [2020] EWHC 2670, Justice Cockerill of the En...
Read More >
Case Law Developments - Place of supply for VAT purposes - The recent case of American Express S...
Read More >
It’s official, almost. Implementation of the new H-1B filing process for 2020 is fast approaching a...
Read More >
Integrated Oncology Network (ION), a portfolio company of Silver Oak Services Partners, has announce...
Read More >