21Aug
Eleventh Circuit Affirms “Exceptional Case” Ruling: Insurer Had No Duty to Defend Construction Debris Claim Where Amended Complaint Omitted Crucial Fact Implicating Pollution Exclusion
Eleventh Circuit Affirms “Exceptional Case” Ruling: Insurer Had No Duty to Defend Construction Debris Claim Where Amended Complaint Omitted Crucial Fact Implicating Pollution Exclusion The Eleventh Circuit, affirming the district court’s departure from Florida’s four corners rule, held that a pollution exclusion barred coverage for a bodily injury claim arising from exposure to construction debris, even though the operative pleading on its face stated a claim within coverage. The court applied...
By:
Rivkin Radler LLP
Related
If you own a successful privately held business, then it is likely you have received a call from a p...
Read More >
When an ex-employee goes to a competitor or starts poaching clients or staff, employers often look t...
Read More >
More than thirty years ago, the Washington Supreme Court ruled defense counsel may not engage in ex ...
Read More >
On March 14, 2019 the Department of Labor issued an opinion letter considering whether employers vio...
Read More >
Antitrust activity in the energy and chemical sectors was steady and robust in 2020. Even though U.S...
Read More >
On August 6, 2019, Acting Governor Sheila Oliver signed into law the New Jersey Wage Theft Act (“WT...
Read More >