21Aug
Eleventh Circuit Affirms “Exceptional Case” Ruling: Insurer Had No Duty to Defend Construction Debris Claim Where Amended Complaint Omitted Crucial Fact Implicating Pollution Exclusion
Eleventh Circuit Affirms “Exceptional Case” Ruling: Insurer Had No Duty to Defend Construction Debris Claim Where Amended Complaint Omitted Crucial Fact Implicating Pollution Exclusion The Eleventh Circuit, affirming the district court’s departure from Florida’s four corners rule, held that a pollution exclusion barred coverage for a bodily injury claim arising from exposure to construction debris, even though the operative pleading on its face stated a claim within coverage. The court applied...
By:
Rivkin Radler LLP
Related
Client issues often arrive like schools of fish – rapidly and in huge numbers. Sometimes this is th...
Read More >
With the future of the EEOC’s pay data collection efforts unclear, California’s effort to legislat...
Read More >
On June 26, 2019, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) granted leave to appeal the Ontario Court of App...
Read More >
Litigation has its place, but most in-house counsel agree: avoid it if at all possible. That’s why ...
Read More >
With just a one-page, single-paragraph Order, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals yesterday provided th...
Read More >
On January 9, 2020, Mexico’s National Institute of Statistics and Geography published in the Offici...
Read More >