21Aug
Eleventh Circuit Affirms “Exceptional Case” Ruling: Insurer Had No Duty to Defend Construction Debris Claim Where Amended Complaint Omitted Crucial Fact Implicating Pollution Exclusion
Eleventh Circuit Affirms “Exceptional Case” Ruling: Insurer Had No Duty to Defend Construction Debris Claim Where Amended Complaint Omitted Crucial Fact Implicating Pollution Exclusion The Eleventh Circuit, affirming the district court’s departure from Florida’s four corners rule, held that a pollution exclusion barred coverage for a bodily injury claim arising from exposure to construction debris, even though the operative pleading on its face stated a claim within coverage. The court applied...
By:
Rivkin Radler LLP
Related
In today’s edition of Daily Compliance News: 1. Swiss bank ignores compliance officer; pays $10.7M...
Read More >
On July 15, 2019, President Trump signed an Executive Order requiring regulations implementing the B...
Read More >
In Steward Health Care System v. CHSPSC, Judge Sanders found that CHSPSC, an affiliate of Community ...
Read More >
Physician groups can keep their practice competitive–and on the “cutting edge”—by partnering wit...
Read More >
“The immunity provision of the Defend Trade Secrets Act creates serious risk for companies: A whist...
Read More >
When I travel to a stadium or a game, I’m a beer snob and I will walk around to find a beer that is...
Read More >