21Aug
Eleventh Circuit Affirms “Exceptional Case” Ruling: Insurer Had No Duty to Defend Construction Debris Claim Where Amended Complaint Omitted Crucial Fact Implicating Pollution Exclusion
Eleventh Circuit Affirms “Exceptional Case” Ruling: Insurer Had No Duty to Defend Construction Debris Claim Where Amended Complaint Omitted Crucial Fact Implicating Pollution Exclusion The Eleventh Circuit, affirming the district court’s departure from Florida’s four corners rule, held that a pollution exclusion barred coverage for a bodily injury claim arising from exposure to construction debris, even though the operative pleading on its face stated a claim within coverage. The court applied...
By:
Rivkin Radler LLP
Related
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has held that an employee of a private con...
Read More >
Drugmaker AstraZeneca agreed on Saturday to buy biopharma company Alexion for $39 billion in cash an...
Read More >
The chances for an accident to occur are quite high when working with heavy machinery. Due to the si...
Read More >
Here are ten common questions I receive from clients about issuing equity (stock or options) to serv...
Read More >
Employers, beware. It has been reported that Immigration and Customs Enforcement has recently begun ...
Read More >
In 1980, Congress enacted the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act ...
Read More >