21Aug
Eleventh Circuit Affirms “Exceptional Case” Ruling: Insurer Had No Duty to Defend Construction Debris Claim Where Amended Complaint Omitted Crucial Fact Implicating Pollution Exclusion
Eleventh Circuit Affirms “Exceptional Case” Ruling: Insurer Had No Duty to Defend Construction Debris Claim Where Amended Complaint Omitted Crucial Fact Implicating Pollution Exclusion The Eleventh Circuit, affirming the district court’s departure from Florida’s four corners rule, held that a pollution exclusion barred coverage for a bodily injury claim arising from exposure to construction debris, even though the operative pleading on its face stated a claim within coverage. The court applied...
By:
Rivkin Radler LLP
Related
One - Latest data from the Investment Association has shown investors plunged nearly four times th...
Read More >
In today’s edition of Daily Compliance News: • Did Under Armour’s aggressive sales goals lead to ...
Read More >
Last week, the California Supreme Court ruled that a former start-up employee could not hold his for...
Read More >
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has now held that a “place of business” for purpos...
Read More >
It seems like we’ve discussed this subject for years. It was May of 2016 when the Obama DOL issued ...
Read More >
Welcome to Exiger Week on Compliance and Coronavirus. As the Voice of Compliance, I wanted to start ...
Read More >