21Aug
Eleventh Circuit Affirms “Exceptional Case” Ruling: Insurer Had No Duty to Defend Construction Debris Claim Where Amended Complaint Omitted Crucial Fact Implicating Pollution Exclusion
Eleventh Circuit Affirms “Exceptional Case” Ruling: Insurer Had No Duty to Defend Construction Debris Claim Where Amended Complaint Omitted Crucial Fact Implicating Pollution Exclusion The Eleventh Circuit, affirming the district court’s departure from Florida’s four corners rule, held that a pollution exclusion barred coverage for a bodily injury claim arising from exposure to construction debris, even though the operative pleading on its face stated a claim within coverage. The court applied...
By:
Rivkin Radler LLP
Related
In its recent ruling in the case of Ewart v. The University of Oxford, the Employment Tribunal (ET) ...
Read More >
This consultation paper proposes a number of amendments to (i) simplify the offer timetable under th...
Read More >
Statutory restrictions on the enforceability of non-compete agreements have gained traction over the...
Read More >
The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom has refused leave to appeal in the case of Chief Constable o...
Read More >
Technology has always had a significant impact on the way companies do business. With the increasing...
Read More >
Welcome to the 2019 edition of the Meritas Legal Guide for Business Investment and Expansion in Aust...
Read More >