15Jul
Recent Decision Impacts Complete Successor-In-Interest Claims
We recently wrote about the impacts of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) on pending bids in Bloomberg Law and our GovCon & Trade Blog. A key point discussed in both articles is that a bidding company’s buyer may not have standing to protest if the buyer is not the complete successor-in-interest to the bidding company. The U.S. Court of Federal Claims recently affirmed this principle in a decision it handed down in the case of Centerline Logistics Corp. v. United States issued in May 2020......
By:
Bass, Berry & Sims PLC
Related
In re Baker Hughes Inc. Merger Litigation, C.A. No. 2019-0638 AGB (Del. Ch. Oct. 27, 2020). This de...
Read More >
On November 6, 2019, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument for Retirement Plans Committee of IBM...
Read More >
As the conversation around antitrust regulation continues to grow, especially given the current poli...
Read More >
In an article published in the Winter issue of Employee Relations Law Journal, Burr attorneys Christ...
Read More >
Earlier this month, the U.S. Small Business Administration (the “SBA”) issued Procedural Notice Co...
Read More >
Now that 2020 is almost here, corporations should be aware of IRS reporting requirements regarding c...
Read More >