15Jul
Recent Decision Impacts Complete Successor-In-Interest Claims
We recently wrote about the impacts of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) on pending bids in Bloomberg Law and our GovCon & Trade Blog. A key point discussed in both articles is that a bidding company’s buyer may not have standing to protest if the buyer is not the complete successor-in-interest to the bidding company. The U.S. Court of Federal Claims recently affirmed this principle in a decision it handed down in the case of Centerline Logistics Corp. v. United States issued in May 2020......
By:
Bass, Berry & Sims PLC
Related
Like many states, Minnesota requires subcontractors and suppliers to send pre-lien notices to owners...
Read More >
In news that was far from earth-shattering, The Department of Labor (DOL) announced a final rule tod...
Read More >
Technology is rapidly evolving, and the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI), automation and robotics...
Read More >
The District of Utah ruled in late May that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, 47 U.S.C....
Read More >
Under generally accepted Title VII principles, an employer can be held liable when a co-worker haras...
Read More >
In January, the Supreme Court agreed to accept an appeal filed by the State of Arkansas of a decisio...
Read More >