10Jul
Massachusetts District Court Holds Contractors Are Not Additional Insureds on Developer’s Builder’s Risk Policy
In Factory Mut. Ins. Co. v. Skanska United States Bldg., No. 18-cv-11700-DLC, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95403 (Skanska), the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts considered whether contractors on a construction job were additional insureds on the developer’s builder’s risk insurance policy. After a water loss occurred during construction, the builder’s risk insurance carrier paid its named insured for the resultant damage, and subsequently filed a subrogation action against...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
On January 10, 2020, the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission released draft ...
Read More >
When I travel to a stadium or a game, I’m a beer snob and I will walk around to find a beer that is...
Read More >
The National Labor Relations Act’s (NLRA or Act) Section 7 grants to all employees — regardless of...
Read More >
When Nevada’s Governor identified construction as an essential business amid the initial directives...
Read More >
On 8 July 2019, the UK Information Commissioner (ICO) issued a statement in response to an announcem...
Read More >
One aspect of the SECURE Act that many commentators failure to note is that it’s mor expensive to f...
Read More >