10Jul
Massachusetts District Court Holds Contractors Are Not Additional Insureds on Developer’s Builder’s Risk Policy
In Factory Mut. Ins. Co. v. Skanska United States Bldg., No. 18-cv-11700-DLC, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95403 (Skanska), the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts considered whether contractors on a construction job were additional insureds on the developer’s builder’s risk insurance policy. After a water loss occurred during construction, the builder’s risk insurance carrier paid its named insured for the resultant damage, and subsequently filed a subrogation action against...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
On January 23, 2020, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) adopted the Office of Environme...
Read More >
The IRS recently issued final regulations to standardize the administration of hardship distribution...
Read More >
The New York City Commission on Human Rights (“the Commission”) published a legal enforcement guid...
Read More >
It is readily apparent that the COVID-19 pandemic has had an impact on transactional activity—at le...
Read More >
The IRS has published Final Regulations finalizing its prior guidance that partners in a partnership...
Read More >
In my article last month, “Should Amazon be Liable for Products Sold in its Marketplace,” I discus...
Read More >