10Jul
Massachusetts District Court Holds Contractors Are Not Additional Insureds on Developer’s Builder’s Risk Policy
In Factory Mut. Ins. Co. v. Skanska United States Bldg., No. 18-cv-11700-DLC, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95403 (Skanska), the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts considered whether contractors on a construction job were additional insureds on the developer’s builder’s risk insurance policy. After a water loss occurred during construction, the builder’s risk insurance carrier paid its named insured for the resultant damage, and subsequently filed a subrogation action against...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
The end of the year brought many changes to the labor law. What’s new for employers? We present par...
Read More >
First Circuit: Two affiliated funds did not form an implied partnership liable for pension obligatio...
Read More >
Nearly three years after employers scrambled to review and adjust worker salaries ahead of anticipat...
Read More >
Setting up a new business in Ontario can raise legal questions and concerns about recruiting and hir...
Read More >
At the end of 2019, courts in the UK decided that ethical veganism is a protected philosophical beli...
Read More >
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) provides federal whistleblower protections against retaliation for empl...
Read More >