10Jul
Massachusetts District Court Holds Contractors Are Not Additional Insureds on Developer’s Builder’s Risk Policy
In Factory Mut. Ins. Co. v. Skanska United States Bldg., No. 18-cv-11700-DLC, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95403 (Skanska), the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts considered whether contractors on a construction job were additional insureds on the developer’s builder’s risk insurance policy. After a water loss occurred during construction, the builder’s risk insurance carrier paid its named insured for the resultant damage, and subsequently filed a subrogation action against...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act was passed on August 21, 1996, during the re...
Read More >
In a recent case before Justice Andrea Masley, Corporate Electrical Technologies, Inc. v. Structure ...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: The Washington State Paid Family and Medical Leave (“WPFML”) law was enacted in...
Read More >
As we previously reported this past summer, the New York State Senate and Assembly passed Senate Bil...
Read More >
Effective January 1, 2020, the minimum wage in Ohio will be $8.70 per hour for non-tipped employees ...
Read More >
Builders’ liens are a useful tool for unpaid contractors and subcontractors on a construction proje...
Read More >