10Jul
Massachusetts District Court Holds Contractors Are Not Additional Insureds on Developer’s Builder’s Risk Policy
In Factory Mut. Ins. Co. v. Skanska United States Bldg., No. 18-cv-11700-DLC, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95403 (Skanska), the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts considered whether contractors on a construction job were additional insureds on the developer’s builder’s risk insurance policy. After a water loss occurred during construction, the builder’s risk insurance carrier paid its named insured for the resultant damage, and subsequently filed a subrogation action against...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
Can a sincerely held religious belief – or a wife’s personal jealousy – justify a male employee r...
Read More >
KEY LEGAL AND REGULATORY DEVELOPMENTS - Legislative and Regulatory Reform - Permanent reforms in...
Read More >
In a premises liability action, the duty a landowner owes depends on the status assigned to the pers...
Read More >
A recent personal injury verdict in Brooklyn is one of the largest ever awarded to a single plaintif...
Read More >
Senior Living Center Refused Employee's Request for an Accommodation, Resulting in Her Termination, ...
Read More >
On September 3, 2020, the Department of Justice's Antitrust Division (the DOJ) issued its new Merger...
Read More >