10Jul
Massachusetts District Court Holds Contractors Are Not Additional Insureds on Developer’s Builder’s Risk Policy
In Factory Mut. Ins. Co. v. Skanska United States Bldg., No. 18-cv-11700-DLC, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95403 (Skanska), the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts considered whether contractors on a construction job were additional insureds on the developer’s builder’s risk insurance policy. After a water loss occurred during construction, the builder’s risk insurance carrier paid its named insured for the resultant damage, and subsequently filed a subrogation action against...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
Effective March 16, 2020, employers will be able to use a four-factor balancing test in determining ...
Read More >
The US Federal Trade Commission today announced increased thresholds for the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antit...
Read More >
Dallas employers will soon be obligated to provide paid sick leave to eligible employees. Under the ...
Read More >
The US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) on November 1 extended the validity of Temporary Protec...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: On February 26, 2020, the Supreme Court unanimously affirmed the Ninth Circuit’s...
Read More >
California Governor Gavin Newsom just signed AB 51 into law, which means that effective January 1, 2...
Read More >