10Jul
Massachusetts District Court Holds Contractors Are Not Additional Insureds on Developer’s Builder’s Risk Policy
In Factory Mut. Ins. Co. v. Skanska United States Bldg., No. 18-cv-11700-DLC, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95403 (Skanska), the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts considered whether contractors on a construction job were additional insureds on the developer’s builder’s risk insurance policy. After a water loss occurred during construction, the builder’s risk insurance carrier paid its named insured for the resultant damage, and subsequently filed a subrogation action against...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
Few things are more fundamental to M&A due diligence than determining whether any of the material co...
Read More >
Just last year, the California Supreme Court in Dynamex Operations West v. Superior Court (2018) 4 C...
Read More >
Market Trends: What You Need to Know - “Sandbagging” concepts are often the subject of intense ne...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopisis: Illinois recently enacted legislation that changes the rules for withholding inc...
Read More >
A recent decision in Sotera Defense Solutions, Inc. v. Department of Agriculture, CBCA 6029, 6030, b...
Read More >
Under Washington’s new Paid Family Medical Leave (PFML) law, eligible employees are entitled to pai...
Read More >