10Jul
Massachusetts District Court Holds Contractors Are Not Additional Insureds on Developer’s Builder’s Risk Policy
In Factory Mut. Ins. Co. v. Skanska United States Bldg., No. 18-cv-11700-DLC, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95403 (Skanska), the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts considered whether contractors on a construction job were additional insureds on the developer’s builder’s risk insurance policy. After a water loss occurred during construction, the builder’s risk insurance carrier paid its named insured for the resultant damage, and subsequently filed a subrogation action against...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
Buyers’ best defence against M&A fraud requires rigorous, pre-closing due diligence — when fraud i...
Read More >
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) published proposed regulations on December 20, 2019, under Sectio...
Read More >
The global presence of the People’s Republic of China (China or PRC) in the construction space is u...
Read More >
Defendants Withdrew Job Offer to Applicant Because He Needed a Job Coach, Federal Agency Charged - ...
Read More >
On November 22, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in Sun Capital Partners III, L...
Read More >
On Tuesday, September 24, 2019, the United States Department of Labor (“Department”) announced its...
Read More >