10Jul
Massachusetts District Court Holds Contractors Are Not Additional Insureds on Developer’s Builder’s Risk Policy
In Factory Mut. Ins. Co. v. Skanska United States Bldg., No. 18-cv-11700-DLC, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95403 (Skanska), the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts considered whether contractors on a construction job were additional insureds on the developer’s builder’s risk insurance policy. After a water loss occurred during construction, the builder’s risk insurance carrier paid its named insured for the resultant damage, and subsequently filed a subrogation action against...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
OSHA announced yesterday that registration is open for an upcoming open informal public meeting to d...
Read More >
16,000 nationwide complaints to OSHA agencies since April prompt sector-specific guidance - OSHA co...
Read More >
With the new year fast approaching, employers with Washington-based workers should ensure—if they h...
Read More >
According to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), the best way for an employer to avoid 401(k) plan m...
Read More >
As a result of developments relating to the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic, the Premerger Notificatio...
Read More >
On December 17*, 2019, the National Labor Relations Board issued its decision in Apogee Retail LLC d...
Read More >