10Jul
Massachusetts District Court Holds Contractors Are Not Additional Insureds on Developer’s Builder’s Risk Policy
In Factory Mut. Ins. Co. v. Skanska United States Bldg., No. 18-cv-11700-DLC, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95403 (Skanska), the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts considered whether contractors on a construction job were additional insureds on the developer’s builder’s risk insurance policy. After a water loss occurred during construction, the builder’s risk insurance carrier paid its named insured for the resultant damage, and subsequently filed a subrogation action against...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
Maintaining its recent focus on compliance issues particular to educational institutions, OFCCP publ...
Read More >
In our previous client alert, we reported that certain key changes were introduced to the United Ara...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: The National Labor Relations Board, pushed out a number of noteworthy decisions e...
Read More >
Concrete Contractor Fired Worker after He Complained about Assault, Federal Agency Says - BALTIMO...
Read More >
It is readily apparent that the COVID-19 pandemic has had an impact on transactional activity—at le...
Read More >
Many high-profile transactions impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic have fallen apart between signing a...
Read More >