10Jul
Massachusetts District Court Holds Contractors Are Not Additional Insureds on Developer’s Builder’s Risk Policy
In Factory Mut. Ins. Co. v. Skanska United States Bldg., No. 18-cv-11700-DLC, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95403 (Skanska), the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts considered whether contractors on a construction job were additional insureds on the developer’s builder’s risk insurance policy. After a water loss occurred during construction, the builder’s risk insurance carrier paid its named insured for the resultant damage, and subsequently filed a subrogation action against...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
Over the past weeks, I’ve written a few times on the ongoing requirements and changing deadlines of...
Read More >
For some time we have been following with interest the case of Bresco Electrical Services Ltd (in li...
Read More >
McDermott was delighted to partner with the BVCA (British Venture Capital Association) on its recent...
Read More >
The Development: The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission ("ACCC") recently issued new gui...
Read More >
Two years after the #MeToo Movement made the prevalence of sexual harassment and sexual assault in t...
Read More >
Topics include legal considerations for: • 401(k) Plan participation: Designing a 401(k) plan to i...
Read More >