10Jul
Massachusetts District Court Holds Contractors Are Not Additional Insureds on Developer’s Builder’s Risk Policy
In Factory Mut. Ins. Co. v. Skanska United States Bldg., No. 18-cv-11700-DLC, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95403 (Skanska), the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts considered whether contractors on a construction job were additional insureds on the developer’s builder’s risk insurance policy. After a water loss occurred during construction, the builder’s risk insurance carrier paid its named insured for the resultant damage, and subsequently filed a subrogation action against...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
Is My New Hire an Employee or a Contractor? Key Factors for Startups to Consider Employee or contra...
Read More >
Moved by Covid’s bite out of the energy industry, oil behemoths ExxonMobil and Chevron Corp. have h...
Read More >
In the first reported case regarding minority oppression in the context of a South Carolina limited ...
Read More >
An acquisition of a new company into your corporate portfolio can be an exciting challenge. As a Hum...
Read More >
Under the CARES Act, an employer otherwise eligible for employee retention credits (“ERC”) is deni...
Read More >
One of the areas articulated in the 2019 Guidance was around payments and payroll. For both the comp...
Read More >