10Jul
Massachusetts District Court Holds Contractors Are Not Additional Insureds on Developer’s Builder’s Risk Policy
In Factory Mut. Ins. Co. v. Skanska United States Bldg., No. 18-cv-11700-DLC, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95403 (Skanska), the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts considered whether contractors on a construction job were additional insureds on the developer’s builder’s risk insurance policy. After a water loss occurred during construction, the builder’s risk insurance carrier paid its named insured for the resultant damage, and subsequently filed a subrogation action against...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
Minnesota Governor Tim Walz's Executive Order 20-20 requesting Minnesotans to limit movements outsid...
Read More >
Early this year, the Social Security Administration (SSA) resumed the mailing of “No-Match” letter...
Read More >
Investments in private companies by way of share purchases from existing shareholders (secondary tra...
Read More >
In the Lacour v. Construction D.M. Turcotte TRO inc. decision delivered in June 2019, the Court of A...
Read More >
Construction partner Laurie Stanziale and Litigation partner and host Rich Schoenstein discuss Const...
Read More >
As 2019 came to a close, the NLRB overturned several significant decisions, approved the settlement ...
Read More >