10Jul
Massachusetts District Court Holds Contractors Are Not Additional Insureds on Developer’s Builder’s Risk Policy
In Factory Mut. Ins. Co. v. Skanska United States Bldg., No. 18-cv-11700-DLC, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95403 (Skanska), the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts considered whether contractors on a construction job were additional insureds on the developer’s builder’s risk insurance policy. After a water loss occurred during construction, the builder’s risk insurance carrier paid its named insured for the resultant damage, and subsequently filed a subrogation action against...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
Further to the Decree of 29 November 2018, which expanded the list of strategic sectors, and to the ...
Read More >
Imagine the following. A developer consults with an architect in 2020 about a six-building condomini...
Read More >
On June 26, 2019, the Toledo City Council approved Ordinance 173-19, titled “Pay Equity Act to Proh...
Read More >
The City of St. Louis Board of Alderman unanimously passed “ban the box” legislation prohibiting e...
Read More >
The latest version of Assembly Bill 5, which codifies the California Supreme Court’s Dynamex decisi...
Read More >
Welcome to the special 10th anniversary celebration of Compliance Man Chooses the Target. In honor o...
Read More >