10Jul
Massachusetts District Court Holds Contractors Are Not Additional Insureds on Developer’s Builder’s Risk Policy
In Factory Mut. Ins. Co. v. Skanska United States Bldg., No. 18-cv-11700-DLC, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95403 (Skanska), the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts considered whether contractors on a construction job were additional insureds on the developer’s builder’s risk insurance policy. After a water loss occurred during construction, the builder’s risk insurance carrier paid its named insured for the resultant damage, and subsequently filed a subrogation action against...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
A group of 18 state attorneys general (the “AGs”) recently filed comments with the Federal Trade C...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: The FCC has proposed new rules that would require employers to have compliant pho...
Read More >
After almost two years of scrutiny by state and federal regulators and an ensuing court battle, T-Mo...
Read More >
Shifting demographics threaten the ability of construction companies to staff projects. Many industr...
Read More >
Over the last decade the use of R&W insurance in merger and acquisition transactions has grown expon...
Read More >
I’ve spent 21 years as an ERISA attorney and took some classes when I was getting my LLM and I lear...
Read More >