10Jul
Massachusetts District Court Holds Contractors Are Not Additional Insureds on Developer’s Builder’s Risk Policy
In Factory Mut. Ins. Co. v. Skanska United States Bldg., No. 18-cv-11700-DLC, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95403 (Skanska), the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts considered whether contractors on a construction job were additional insureds on the developer’s builder’s risk insurance policy. After a water loss occurred during construction, the builder’s risk insurance carrier paid its named insured for the resultant damage, and subsequently filed a subrogation action against...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
Effective February 27, 2020, the filing thresholds for the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements ...
Read More >
All eyes were on health care in 2020, as the industry faced unprecedented challenges presented by th...
Read More >
Warm sunny days and cool evenings entice motorists, bicyclists and pedestrians to get out and about ...
Read More >
Beginning September 29, 2019, it will be against the law in Illinois for employers to ask job applic...
Read More >
When it comes to an unfair practice allegation asserting an employer’s statement is unlawful, words...
Read More >
Why This Matters - On August 12, 2019, New York Governor Cuomo signed into law legislation that gre...
Read More >