10Jul
Massachusetts District Court Holds Contractors Are Not Additional Insureds on Developer’s Builder’s Risk Policy
In Factory Mut. Ins. Co. v. Skanska United States Bldg., No. 18-cv-11700-DLC, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95403 (Skanska), the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts considered whether contractors on a construction job were additional insureds on the developer’s builder’s risk insurance policy. After a water loss occurred during construction, the builder’s risk insurance carrier paid its named insured for the resultant damage, and subsequently filed a subrogation action against...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
In France, the Professional Future Law of September 5, 2018, amended the Employment Obligation of Di...
Read More >
Soon after being elected, New Jersey’s Governor created a task force to end misclassification of in...
Read More >
This White Paper highlights the legal and regulatory considerations in the United States, the United...
Read More >
ON 11 NOVEMBER 2020 THE UK GOVERNMENT PUBLISHED ITS NATIONAL SECURITY AND INVESTMENT BILL. IF THE BI...
Read More >
Last Monday, the U.S. Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division issued proposed regulations that...
Read More >
A recent Illinois Appellate Court case appears to have closed a loophole through which some school d...
Read More >