10Jul
Massachusetts District Court Holds Contractors Are Not Additional Insureds on Developer’s Builder’s Risk Policy
In Factory Mut. Ins. Co. v. Skanska United States Bldg., No. 18-cv-11700-DLC, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95403 (Skanska), the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts considered whether contractors on a construction job were additional insureds on the developer’s builder’s risk insurance policy. After a water loss occurred during construction, the builder’s risk insurance carrier paid its named insured for the resultant damage, and subsequently filed a subrogation action against...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
The High Court has held a company’s officers personally, jointly and severally liable to its employ...
Read More >
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has released a revised Form W-4 for 2020. The IRS stated that the...
Read More >
Although acquisition activity in the European leveraged finance market has been on an upward traject...
Read More >
As we previously reported, the Minneapolis Wage Theft Prevention Ordinance will go into effect on Ja...
Read More >
Over thirty-five years ago, the NLRB held that an employer may not prohibit a union organizer’s acc...
Read More >
On January 28, 2020, the Federal Register published an FTC notice with the latest annual adjustments...
Read More >