10Jul
Massachusetts District Court Holds Contractors Are Not Additional Insureds on Developer’s Builder’s Risk Policy
In Factory Mut. Ins. Co. v. Skanska United States Bldg., No. 18-cv-11700-DLC, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95403 (Skanska), the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts considered whether contractors on a construction job were additional insureds on the developer’s builder’s risk insurance policy. After a water loss occurred during construction, the builder’s risk insurance carrier paid its named insured for the resultant damage, and subsequently filed a subrogation action against...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
Upending recent precedent, the National Labor Relations Board, yesterday, proposed a rule that, if a...
Read More >
COVID-19 has spread rapidly across the world since it first emerged in late 2019 and has impacted ev...
Read More >
There are several fundamental principles and concepts that governmental plan sponsors and fiduciarie...
Read More >
A year after Akorn v. Fresenius (Akorn case), the first Delaware case holding that a party was entit...
Read More >
After the City of Los Angeles issued a requirement that contractors develop COVID-19 plans, many cit...
Read More >
Protection Against Inappropriate Behavior or Abuse at Work - New Legislation Enacted - Ministerial...
Read More >