10Jul
Massachusetts District Court Holds Contractors Are Not Additional Insureds on Developer’s Builder’s Risk Policy
In Factory Mut. Ins. Co. v. Skanska United States Bldg., No. 18-cv-11700-DLC, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95403 (Skanska), the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts considered whether contractors on a construction job were additional insureds on the developer’s builder’s risk insurance policy. After a water loss occurred during construction, the builder’s risk insurance carrier paid its named insured for the resultant damage, and subsequently filed a subrogation action against...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
On Tuesday, August 27, 2019, President Trump formally nominated Eugene Scalia to serve as Secretary ...
Read More >
Class action lawsuits brought under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) continue t...
Read More >
As we enter the 2020s, we begin the new decade with greater optimism than we had at the start of the...
Read More >
Governments all over the world are continuing to take steps to strengthen their powers to intervene ...
Read More >
Concrete Contractor Fired Secretary Who Opposed Racial Slurs, Federal Agency Says - BALTIMORE - Ba...
Read More >
In a 2-1 decision issued on August 2, 2019, the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”) in El...
Read More >