10Jul
Massachusetts District Court Holds Contractors Are Not Additional Insureds on Developer’s Builder’s Risk Policy
In Factory Mut. Ins. Co. v. Skanska United States Bldg., No. 18-cv-11700-DLC, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95403 (Skanska), the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts considered whether contractors on a construction job were additional insureds on the developer’s builder’s risk insurance policy. After a water loss occurred during construction, the builder’s risk insurance carrier paid its named insured for the resultant damage, and subsequently filed a subrogation action against...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
In recent years, an issue under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) has draw...
Read More >
The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a sudden disruption to businesses and halted almost all forms of gl...
Read More >
Employers may have to prepare for an entirely new pay data reporting requirement to be revealed in t...
Read More >
The SEC has sued “cybersecurity pioneer John McAfee” for “promoting the sale of cryptocurrencies ...
Read More >
Referencing a pop tune in the title of an article about organization design might seem a bit banal, ...
Read More >
On December 24, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court’s...
Read More >