10Jul
Massachusetts District Court Holds Contractors Are Not Additional Insureds on Developer’s Builder’s Risk Policy
In Factory Mut. Ins. Co. v. Skanska United States Bldg., No. 18-cv-11700-DLC, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95403 (Skanska), the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts considered whether contractors on a construction job were additional insureds on the developer’s builder’s risk insurance policy. After a water loss occurred during construction, the builder’s risk insurance carrier paid its named insured for the resultant damage, and subsequently filed a subrogation action against...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
In today’s edition Sunday Book Review edition of Daily Compliance News: 1. India and the Cold War ...
Read More >
In “La La Land,” Damien Chazelle’s Oscar winning film, the audience thinks it has a formulaic Hol...
Read More >
In our first webinar, we will address: - Understanding what is possible with nonprofit advocacy -...
Read More >
It's the end of the year and while everyone is busy, employers in California should be aware of new ...
Read More >
This OnPoint reports on the guidance recently issued by the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EH...
Read More >
Prior to these changes, physicians and PAs had to enter into “delegation of services agreements,” ...
Read More >