10Jul
Massachusetts District Court Holds Contractors Are Not Additional Insureds on Developer’s Builder’s Risk Policy
In Factory Mut. Ins. Co. v. Skanska United States Bldg., No. 18-cv-11700-DLC, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95403 (Skanska), the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts considered whether contractors on a construction job were additional insureds on the developer’s builder’s risk insurance policy. After a water loss occurred during construction, the builder’s risk insurance carrier paid its named insured for the resultant damage, and subsequently filed a subrogation action against...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
On April 7, the City of Oakland Planning and Building Department released findings and determination...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: With limited exception, Puerto Rico has joined the growing list of states that p...
Read More >
When prospective buyers conduct legal due diligence in merger and acquisition transactions the main ...
Read More >
On January 27 and 28, 2021, over 300 participants joined Morrison & Foerster’s webinars on “SPAC 1...
Read More >
The EEOC has released its annual report on the number of discrimination charges filed across the cou...
Read More >
Competition/antitrust laws generally require rival firms to operate on the market independently of e...
Read More >