10Jul
Massachusetts District Court Holds Contractors Are Not Additional Insureds on Developer’s Builder’s Risk Policy
In Factory Mut. Ins. Co. v. Skanska United States Bldg., No. 18-cv-11700-DLC, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95403 (Skanska), the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts considered whether contractors on a construction job were additional insureds on the developer’s builder’s risk insurance policy. After a water loss occurred during construction, the builder’s risk insurance carrier paid its named insured for the resultant damage, and subsequently filed a subrogation action against...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
The Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (DEM) announced today that $3 million is ava...
Read More >
Last week, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued additional guidance on two outstanding issues r...
Read More >
Q: Is FMLA 480 hours under every circumstance? A: No, the FMLA uses something called the fluctuatin...
Read More >
In this update, we consider key statistics, trends, developments and highlights regarding U.K. publi...
Read More >
Many employers seek to leverage foreign talent by hiring highly skilled foreign professionals throug...
Read More >
Trade journals are full of articles discussing the plethora of M&A deals that have recently closed. ...
Read More >