10Jul
Massachusetts District Court Holds Contractors Are Not Additional Insureds on Developer’s Builder’s Risk Policy
In Factory Mut. Ins. Co. v. Skanska United States Bldg., No. 18-cv-11700-DLC, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95403 (Skanska), the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts considered whether contractors on a construction job were additional insureds on the developer’s builder’s risk insurance policy. After a water loss occurred during construction, the builder’s risk insurance carrier paid its named insured for the resultant damage, and subsequently filed a subrogation action against...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
The Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs - Guidance Document (2019 Guidance) was very clear a...
Read More >
North Carolina’s Retaliatory Employment Discrimination Act (REDA) prohibits employers from taking r...
Read More >
“Some day, California’s going to fall into the ocean” usually refers to the San Andreas fault. No...
Read More >
Things were starting to get dicey in the Garden State as the legislature debated a California-like p...
Read More >
In today’s edition of Daily Compliance News: 1. Another way in which the 737 MAX is impacting the ...
Read More >
We know August was exhausting for employers – New York, New Jersey, Maine, Colorado, and yes, even ...
Read More >