10Jul
Massachusetts District Court Holds Contractors Are Not Additional Insureds on Developer’s Builder’s Risk Policy
In Factory Mut. Ins. Co. v. Skanska United States Bldg., No. 18-cv-11700-DLC, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95403 (Skanska), the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts considered whether contractors on a construction job were additional insureds on the developer’s builder’s risk insurance policy. After a water loss occurred during construction, the builder’s risk insurance carrier paid its named insured for the resultant damage, and subsequently filed a subrogation action against...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
The Department of Labor (DOL) has announced the final version of a rule, proposed in March 2019, whi...
Read More >
Eleventh Circuit Affirms “Exceptional Case” Ruling: Insurer Had No Duty to Defend Construction Deb...
Read More >
Internet data center (“IDC”) projects in China have attracted ever-increasing investment interest ...
Read More >
On 18 November 2019, the Equator Principles Association (EPA) published the final text of a new vers...
Read More >
Whether a wrongfully dismissed employee is entitled to damages as compensation for the value of ince...
Read More >
This update tracks COVID-19 shutdown orders as of April 29, 2020, 12:00 p.m. EDT that affect constru...
Read More >