10Jul
Massachusetts District Court Holds Contractors Are Not Additional Insureds on Developer’s Builder’s Risk Policy
In Factory Mut. Ins. Co. v. Skanska United States Bldg., No. 18-cv-11700-DLC, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95403 (Skanska), the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts considered whether contractors on a construction job were additional insureds on the developer’s builder’s risk insurance policy. After a water loss occurred during construction, the builder’s risk insurance carrier paid its named insured for the resultant damage, and subsequently filed a subrogation action against...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
On December 16, 2019, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued a major decision restoring em...
Read More >
It’s the price and cost problem, stupid. That’s a fictitious but new tattoo that voters might want...
Read More >
The U.S. Department of State has released the October 2019 Visa Bulletin, the first for fiscal year ...
Read More >
In case you haven’t had your eye on matters of global intrigue of late, figured we’d get you a bit...
Read More >
Since the start of fiscal year 2020 (October 1, 2019-September 30, 2020), the Equal Employment Oppor...
Read More >
The move by some employer plans to a “reference-based” pricing model has created a need for health...
Read More >