10Jul
Massachusetts District Court Holds Contractors Are Not Additional Insureds on Developer’s Builder’s Risk Policy
In Factory Mut. Ins. Co. v. Skanska United States Bldg., No. 18-cv-11700-DLC, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95403 (Skanska), the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts considered whether contractors on a construction job were additional insureds on the developer’s builder’s risk insurance policy. After a water loss occurred during construction, the builder’s risk insurance carrier paid its named insured for the resultant damage, and subsequently filed a subrogation action against...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
This is part three of the newsletter presenting amendments to Polish labor law. This part reviews am...
Read More >
Although cannabis remains illegal under federal law, the legalization of cannabis on the state-level...
Read More >
Includes Key Federal Sector Decisions and Special Article on Religious Accommodation in the Workplac...
Read More >
On January 13, 2020, the U.S. Department of Treasury published final regulations relating to the Com...
Read More >
What will the oil and gas landscape look like in 2021? Managing Director Gary Pittman discusses bank...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: New Jersey Has Joined California and New York as the Third State to Formally Amen...
Read More >