10Jul
Massachusetts District Court Holds Contractors Are Not Additional Insureds on Developer’s Builder’s Risk Policy
In Factory Mut. Ins. Co. v. Skanska United States Bldg., No. 18-cv-11700-DLC, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95403 (Skanska), the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts considered whether contractors on a construction job were additional insureds on the developer’s builder’s risk insurance policy. After a water loss occurred during construction, the builder’s risk insurance carrier paid its named insured for the resultant damage, and subsequently filed a subrogation action against...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
Seyfarth Synopsis: A New York appellate court recently held that New York employers may be liable f...
Read More >
In the course of the “Panama Paper” scandal, Directive (EU) 2015/849 on the prevention of the use ...
Read More >
The current economic downturn is expected to bring about a growing niche of investment opportunities...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: In two months (on March 31, 2020), the window closes for 403(b) plan sponsors to ...
Read More >
As a 401(k) plan sponsor, I’m sure you’ve been spoken to by a plan provider who wants you as a cli...
Read More >
California environmental agencies recently issued a draft vapor intrusion guidance document that wil...
Read More >