10Jul
Massachusetts District Court Holds Contractors Are Not Additional Insureds on Developer’s Builder’s Risk Policy
In Factory Mut. Ins. Co. v. Skanska United States Bldg., No. 18-cv-11700-DLC, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95403 (Skanska), the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts considered whether contractors on a construction job were additional insureds on the developer’s builder’s risk insurance policy. After a water loss occurred during construction, the builder’s risk insurance carrier paid its named insured for the resultant damage, and subsequently filed a subrogation action against...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
Apple tipped the $2 trillion mark this week, the first U.S. company to reach that valuation mileston...
Read More >
The UK government’s long-awaited National Security and Investment Bill (the Bill), which paves the ...
Read More >
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission yesterday withdrew its 1997 policy statement that had di...
Read More >
Nossaman partners hosted a virtual panel discussion on June 3, 2020 covering strategies for successf...
Read More >
Payers are increasingly establishing purported “site of service” policies and guidelines that rest...
Read More >
In this episode of Trekking Through Compliance, we consider the episode Elan of Troyius which aired ...
Read More >