10Jul
Massachusetts District Court Holds Contractors Are Not Additional Insureds on Developer’s Builder’s Risk Policy
In Factory Mut. Ins. Co. v. Skanska United States Bldg., No. 18-cv-11700-DLC, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95403 (Skanska), the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts considered whether contractors on a construction job were additional insureds on the developer’s builder’s risk insurance policy. After a water loss occurred during construction, the builder’s risk insurance carrier paid its named insured for the resultant damage, and subsequently filed a subrogation action against...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
Processing delays for immigration cases have increased by 46 percent in the past two fiscal years an...
Read More >
While the California Labor Code specifies that an off-duty meal period must consist of at least 30 m...
Read More >
On November 21, 2019, the U.S. House of Representatives passed House Resolution (HR) 1309, the Workp...
Read More >
The Situation: As part of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's ("SEC") continued focus on r...
Read More >
In a notice of proposed rulemaking and request for comments published on August 12, 2019, the NLRB e...
Read More >
After a busy year for non-compete regulation at the state level, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) ...
Read More >