10Jul
Massachusetts District Court Holds Contractors Are Not Additional Insureds on Developer’s Builder’s Risk Policy
In Factory Mut. Ins. Co. v. Skanska United States Bldg., No. 18-cv-11700-DLC, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95403 (Skanska), the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts considered whether contractors on a construction job were additional insureds on the developer’s builder’s risk insurance policy. After a water loss occurred during construction, the builder’s risk insurance carrier paid its named insured for the resultant damage, and subsequently filed a subrogation action against...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
The Federal Trade Commission, with the concurrence of the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department ...
Read More >
Welcome to the 22nd edition of our newsletter on developments in the automotive industry published b...
Read More >
As the number of COVID-19 cases continues to rise, state and local officials in California are takin...
Read More >
In Belanger v Western Ventilation Products Ltd, 2019 ABQB 571, a Master of the Alberta Court of Quee...
Read More >
The Department of Labor’s Veterans Employment and Training Services (“VETS”) issued a new fact sh...
Read More >
Two important employment-related bills have been introduced in the House of Representatives of Arizo...
Read More >