10Jul
Massachusetts District Court Holds Contractors Are Not Additional Insureds on Developer’s Builder’s Risk Policy
In Factory Mut. Ins. Co. v. Skanska United States Bldg., No. 18-cv-11700-DLC, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95403 (Skanska), the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts considered whether contractors on a construction job were additional insureds on the developer’s builder’s risk insurance policy. After a water loss occurred during construction, the builder’s risk insurance carrier paid its named insured for the resultant damage, and subsequently filed a subrogation action against...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
Welcome to a special five-part podcast series from the Compliance Podcast Network. In this series I ...
Read More >
Noncompete reform continues to crop up in New England. We previously wrote about comprehensive refor...
Read More >
The current COVID-19 crisis has complicated all facets of life, including securing mechanic’s liens...
Read More >
Introduction - Those entering into new construction contracts should include custom language addres...
Read More >
The standard for an “occurrence” under a commercial general liability (CGL) insurance policy has b...
Read More >
The Supreme Court of Texas recently announced that local governments who have agreed to arbitration ...
Read More >