10Jul
Massachusetts District Court Holds Contractors Are Not Additional Insureds on Developer’s Builder’s Risk Policy
In Factory Mut. Ins. Co. v. Skanska United States Bldg., No. 18-cv-11700-DLC, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95403 (Skanska), the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts considered whether contractors on a construction job were additional insureds on the developer’s builder’s risk insurance policy. After a water loss occurred during construction, the builder’s risk insurance carrier paid its named insured for the resultant damage, and subsequently filed a subrogation action against...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
Job Interview Denied After Applicant Requested Sign Language Interpreter, Federal Agency Charges - ...
Read More >
The National Labor Relations Board (the "NLRB" or "Board") issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on...
Read More >
On the heels of the welcome news that employers have three more months to prepare for Massachusetts ...
Read More >
On December 17, 2019, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) held that confidentiality mandat...
Read More >
The California Corporate Securities Law of 1968, like the federal Securities Act of 1933 and Securit...
Read More >
The following are some immigration enforcement and compliance trends we are watching closely heading...
Read More >