10Jul
Massachusetts District Court Holds Contractors Are Not Additional Insureds on Developer’s Builder’s Risk Policy
In Factory Mut. Ins. Co. v. Skanska United States Bldg., No. 18-cv-11700-DLC, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95403 (Skanska), the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts considered whether contractors on a construction job were additional insureds on the developer’s builder’s risk insurance policy. After a water loss occurred during construction, the builder’s risk insurance carrier paid its named insured for the resultant damage, and subsequently filed a subrogation action against...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
On August 5, 2020, the Seminole County Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously voted to table the...
Read More >
On Thursday, February 20, 2020, the Commissioner of the Texas Department of Insurance issued a bulle...
Read More >
Employers in Pennsylvania that require licenses as a condition of employment may have to revisit the...
Read More >
Less than two months apart, two U.S. Courts of Appeal examined the same two issues involving Amazon ...
Read More >
An employee does not have to demonstrate that she suffered an adverse employment action to prevail o...
Read More >
The South Carolina Supreme Court just ruled that the state will no longer recognize common-law marri...
Read More >