25Jun
Swire v Secretary of State [2020]: A cautionary tale for applicants seeking screening directions
A recent High Court ruling in the case of R (Swire) v Secretary of State [2020] has highlighted the subtleties in the approach to screening decisions and particularly in the assessment of measures to mitigate the adverse effects of a proposed development, in cases where negative screening opinions are given. Environmental Impact Assessments (“EIAs”) have long been a fertile area for legal challenge to planning permissions due to the complexities and subtleties of the EIA regime....
By:
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Related
The U.S. Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division (WHD) released three new opinion letters last...
Read More >
On February 1, 2021, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced its revised annual threshold that ...
Read More >
In this episode of Trekking Through Compliance, we consider the episode I, Mudd which aired on Novem...
Read More >
Webinar Agenda – Private Sector: 1.Health and Welfare Plan Updates: • Affordable Care Act Update...
Read More >
On November 20, 2019, the Pennsylvania State Senate passed Senate Bill 79 (“SB 79”), which would i...
Read More >
Many failures in business today could be addressed or even prevented with better policy management. ...
Read More >