25Jun
Swire v Secretary of State [2020]: A cautionary tale for applicants seeking screening directions
A recent High Court ruling in the case of R (Swire) v Secretary of State [2020] has highlighted the subtleties in the approach to screening decisions and particularly in the assessment of measures to mitigate the adverse effects of a proposed development, in cases where negative screening opinions are given. Environmental Impact Assessments (“EIAs”) have long been a fertile area for legal challenge to planning permissions due to the complexities and subtleties of the EIA regime....
By:
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Related
The impending "expiration" of the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) clearance on the most rece...
Read More >
HM Treasury call for input on review of UK funds regime - HM Treasury has published a call for input...
Read More >
The Second Circuit ruled this month in Lenzi v. Systemax, Inc. that “Title VII does not require a s...
Read More >
On February 26, 2020, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) formally issued its final rule on jo...
Read More >
Delaware Bankruptcy Judge Brendan Shannon granted mechanic’s lien claimants $1.6 million for making...
Read More >
With the exponential spread of COVID-19, owners, contractors, and design professionals are recognizi...
Read More >