25Jun
Swire v Secretary of State [2020]: A cautionary tale for applicants seeking screening directions
A recent High Court ruling in the case of R (Swire) v Secretary of State [2020] has highlighted the subtleties in the approach to screening decisions and particularly in the assessment of measures to mitigate the adverse effects of a proposed development, in cases where negative screening opinions are given. Environmental Impact Assessments (“EIAs”) have long been a fertile area for legal challenge to planning permissions due to the complexities and subtleties of the EIA regime....
By:
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Related
On September 24, 2019, the U.S. Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”) proposed regulations to ex...
Read More >
As we have all witnessed, the COVID-19 situation remains incredibly fluid and presents unique challe...
Read More >
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) recently released an updated National Empha...
Read More >
In the latest volley across the partisan line in the saga of whether college teaching and research a...
Read More >
If there was any question about whether there is a growing national trend to limit the enforceabilit...
Read More >
In Shareholder Representative Services LLC v. RSI Holdco, LLC, No. 2018-0517-KSJM, 2019 WL 2290916 (...
Read More >