25Jun
Swire v Secretary of State [2020]: A cautionary tale for applicants seeking screening directions
A recent High Court ruling in the case of R (Swire) v Secretary of State [2020] has highlighted the subtleties in the approach to screening decisions and particularly in the assessment of measures to mitigate the adverse effects of a proposed development, in cases where negative screening opinions are given. Environmental Impact Assessments (“EIAs”) have long been a fertile area for legal challenge to planning permissions due to the complexities and subtleties of the EIA regime....
By:
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Related
White & Case Technology Newsflash - In line with the increased protectionism around foreign direct ...
Read More >
Apple tipped the $2 trillion mark this week, the first U.S. company to reach that valuation mileston...
Read More >
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has proposed a new fee schedule designed to mitigate an ap...
Read More >
In the UK, the definition of "worker" includes both employees and anyone else working under a contra...
Read More >
In celebration of the 100th episode of Corruption Crime and Compliance, Tom Fox, the Compliance Evan...
Read More >
Our Antitrust and M&A Groups analyze this year’s Federal Trade Commission updates to its thresholds...
Read More >