25Jun
Swire v Secretary of State [2020]: A cautionary tale for applicants seeking screening directions
A recent High Court ruling in the case of R (Swire) v Secretary of State [2020] has highlighted the subtleties in the approach to screening decisions and particularly in the assessment of measures to mitigate the adverse effects of a proposed development, in cases where negative screening opinions are given. Environmental Impact Assessments (“EIAs”) have long been a fertile area for legal challenge to planning permissions due to the complexities and subtleties of the EIA regime....
By:
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Related
With the close of the latest Tennessee legislative session, this Construction Law Alert discusses ne...
Read More >
The location exception to CEQA’s categorical exemptions does not apply to earthquake and landslide ...
Read More >
El 6 de enero de 2020, el H. Congreso de la Unión de México, publicó la Ley Orgánica del Centro Fede...
Read More >
Studies previously showed that participation rates in a 401(k) plan are negatively impacted when the...
Read More >
As we previously reported, New York State significantly amended its antidiscrimination laws, with ma...
Read More >
In July of 2016, Lisa and Robert Gerbino (hereinafter “Gerbinos”) made an application to the Town ...
Read More >