25Jun
Swire v Secretary of State [2020]: A cautionary tale for applicants seeking screening directions
A recent High Court ruling in the case of R (Swire) v Secretary of State [2020] has highlighted the subtleties in the approach to screening decisions and particularly in the assessment of measures to mitigate the adverse effects of a proposed development, in cases where negative screening opinions are given. Environmental Impact Assessments (“EIAs”) have long been a fertile area for legal challenge to planning permissions due to the complexities and subtleties of the EIA regime....
By:
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Related
New rules to be introduced from April 2020 will make certain companies who engage workers through in...
Read More >
For the fifth consecutive year, the Bass, Berry & Sims Healthcare Private Equity Team hosted BBS Con...
Read More >
Governor Newsom proposes new plan for San Joaquin River Delta - Governor Gavin Newsom revealed a n...
Read More >
I recently had the opportunity to visit with Michele Edwards, Partner at StoneTurn, to consider som...
Read More >
In response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) global pandemic, seven counties in California—Alameda, Co...
Read More >
Report on Supply Chain Compliance 3, no. 1 (January 9, 2020) - A young girl in the United Kingdom f...
Read More >