25Jun
Swire v Secretary of State [2020]: A cautionary tale for applicants seeking screening directions
A recent High Court ruling in the case of R (Swire) v Secretary of State [2020] has highlighted the subtleties in the approach to screening decisions and particularly in the assessment of measures to mitigate the adverse effects of a proposed development, in cases where negative screening opinions are given. Environmental Impact Assessments (“EIAs”) have long been a fertile area for legal challenge to planning permissions due to the complexities and subtleties of the EIA regime....
By:
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Related
Netflix is (figuratively) on fire this summer, as it has released tons of new content clearly calcul...
Read More >
Employers should understand how to handle I-9 inspections by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (IC...
Read More >
A California federal court decertified a class of millions of Walmart employees after concluding tha...
Read More >
Significant changes are expected for the upcoming H-1B cap process in 2020. With the holiday season ...
Read More >
A Massachusetts federal court just ruled that gig workers cannot escape arbitration provisions by cl...
Read More >
On December 6, 2019, a divided Second Circuit panel concluded that settlement proposals in accepted ...
Read More >