25Jun
Swire v Secretary of State [2020]: A cautionary tale for applicants seeking screening directions
A recent High Court ruling in the case of R (Swire) v Secretary of State [2020] has highlighted the subtleties in the approach to screening decisions and particularly in the assessment of measures to mitigate the adverse effects of a proposed development, in cases where negative screening opinions are given. Environmental Impact Assessments (“EIAs”) have long been a fertile area for legal challenge to planning permissions due to the complexities and subtleties of the EIA regime....
By:
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Related
A recent decision by the National Labor Relations Board (the “NLRB” or “Board”) makes it easier ...
Read More >
The evolving coronavirus/COVID-19 pandemic, which has caused profound worldwide human suffering, has...
Read More >
Robinson+Cole’s Construction Group is pleased to bring you a recap of posts from our Construction L...
Read More >
Last year, new California legislation effective January 1, 2019 expanded the mandatory sexual harass...
Read More >
The Situation: The Australian Taxation Office ("ATO") has broadened its role in the process for revi...
Read More >
Employers in the Golden State are well aware that last year in Dynamex v. Superior Court the Califor...
Read More >