25Jun
Swire v Secretary of State [2020]: A cautionary tale for applicants seeking screening directions
A recent High Court ruling in the case of R (Swire) v Secretary of State [2020] has highlighted the subtleties in the approach to screening decisions and particularly in the assessment of measures to mitigate the adverse effects of a proposed development, in cases where negative screening opinions are given. Environmental Impact Assessments (“EIAs”) have long been a fertile area for legal challenge to planning permissions due to the complexities and subtleties of the EIA regime....
By:
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Related
Starting in 2020, employers will be able to offer health reimbursement arrangements (HRAs) that work...
Read More >
You won’t want to miss four days of exclusive, virtual events that bring together industry leaders,...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: U.S. District Court in New York issued a nationwide injunction blocking the impl...
Read More >
Alabama’s materialman’s lien statute (specifically, Ala. Code § 35-11-211) was intended to provide...
Read More >
Dentist Office Fired Receptionist After Learning of Her Pregnancy, Federal Agency Charged - DALLAS...
Read More >
On August 27, 2019, the Legislative Chamber passed bill no. 21.141, called “Law to Regulate Remote ...
Read More >