25Jun
Swire v Secretary of State [2020]: A cautionary tale for applicants seeking screening directions
A recent High Court ruling in the case of R (Swire) v Secretary of State [2020] has highlighted the subtleties in the approach to screening decisions and particularly in the assessment of measures to mitigate the adverse effects of a proposed development, in cases where negative screening opinions are given. Environmental Impact Assessments (“EIAs”) have long been a fertile area for legal challenge to planning permissions due to the complexities and subtleties of the EIA regime....
By:
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Related
In Expeditors and Production Service Company, Inc. v. Director, OWCP (Garrick Spain), No. 18-60895 (...
Read More >
In early January 2021, the U.S. Department of Justice’s (“the DOJ”) Antitrust Division (“the Div...
Read More >
Supermarket Fired Deli Clerk Because of Her Disability, Federal Agency Charged - FRESNO, Calif. - ...
Read More >
This is a follow up to our previous client alert regarding potential extensions of permits and devel...
Read More >
In a market with soaring multiples, private equity buyers are increasingly on the hunt to mitigate h...
Read More >
In this episode I visit with Vin DiCianni on how ethical culture is a part of an overall ethics and...
Read More >