25Jun
Swire v Secretary of State [2020]: A cautionary tale for applicants seeking screening directions
A recent High Court ruling in the case of R (Swire) v Secretary of State [2020] has highlighted the subtleties in the approach to screening decisions and particularly in the assessment of measures to mitigate the adverse effects of a proposed development, in cases where negative screening opinions are given. Environmental Impact Assessments (“EIAs”) have long been a fertile area for legal challenge to planning permissions due to the complexities and subtleties of the EIA regime....
By:
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Related
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court upheld the Pittsburgh Paid Sick Days Act (“PSDA”) in a decision tod...
Read More >
Paid Family Leave bill heading to a showdown - The Senate approved the conference committee report ...
Read More >
New York State lawmakers have approved broad legislation that will lower the burden on plaintiffs se...
Read More >
The EEOC has been no stranger to headlines in recent months, particularly on the issue of equal pay....
Read More >
You’ve attended the webinars on navigating COVID-19. You’ve read the trade publication tips. You h...
Read More >
AB Stable VIII LLC v. MAPS Hotels and Resorts One LLC, C.A. No. 2020-0310-JTL (Del. Ch. Nov. 30, 202...
Read More >