25Jun
Swire v Secretary of State [2020]: A cautionary tale for applicants seeking screening directions
A recent High Court ruling in the case of R (Swire) v Secretary of State [2020] has highlighted the subtleties in the approach to screening decisions and particularly in the assessment of measures to mitigate the adverse effects of a proposed development, in cases where negative screening opinions are given. Environmental Impact Assessments (“EIAs”) have long been a fertile area for legal challenge to planning permissions due to the complexities and subtleties of the EIA regime....
By:
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Related
Seyfarth Synopsis: Just last week, San Antonio agreed to delay implementation of its paid sick leave...
Read More >
I always dreamed of traveling the world. I studied languages at university, spent time abroad, and h...
Read More >
Under North Carolina statute, employees who leave work for a reason other than good cause attributab...
Read More >
On March 23, 2020, Oregon Governor Kate Brown issued Executive Order No. 20-12 directing Oregonians ...
Read More >
Apparently hoping to urge China off of its new go-slow tactic, the White House is applying its maxim...
Read More >
Stop me if you’ve heard this story before. The Board sets a growth target for the upcoming year. Th...
Read More >