25Jun
Swire v Secretary of State [2020]: A cautionary tale for applicants seeking screening directions
A recent High Court ruling in the case of R (Swire) v Secretary of State [2020] has highlighted the subtleties in the approach to screening decisions and particularly in the assessment of measures to mitigate the adverse effects of a proposed development, in cases where negative screening opinions are given. Environmental Impact Assessments (“EIAs”) have long been a fertile area for legal challenge to planning permissions due to the complexities and subtleties of the EIA regime....
By:
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Related
Have you seen situations in which executives are subject to non-compete and non-solicit covenants in...
Read More >
OSHA announced yesterday that registration is open for an upcoming open informal public meeting to d...
Read More >
On January 10, 2020, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Department of Justice Antitrust Division...
Read More >
On March 31, 2020, Gov. Baker revised the list of “essential” services in Massachusetts. The revis...
Read More >
In a positive development for non-union contractors, a federal judge has reaffirmed the traditional ...
Read More >
The Federal Trade Commission has announced revised jurisdictional and filing fee thresholds under th...
Read More >