25Jun
Swire v Secretary of State [2020]: A cautionary tale for applicants seeking screening directions
A recent High Court ruling in the case of R (Swire) v Secretary of State [2020] has highlighted the subtleties in the approach to screening decisions and particularly in the assessment of measures to mitigate the adverse effects of a proposed development, in cases where negative screening opinions are given. Environmental Impact Assessments (“EIAs”) have long been a fertile area for legal challenge to planning permissions due to the complexities and subtleties of the EIA regime....
By:
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Related
The FTC recently reminded market participants to take steps to avoid violating the per se prohibitio...
Read More >
Buckingham Tax Attorneys Steve Dimengo and Rich Fry recently obtained a favorable ruling from the 9t...
Read More >
The pandemic is driving the business world on-line in more ways. Arrangements for listed companies...
Read More >
The City of St. Petersburg, Florida is one of the latest municipalities to incorporate the concepts ...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: Following an announcement and the release of FAQs, the City of San Antonio releas...
Read More >
The California Court of Appeal recently ruled that a "wage and hour" exclusion in an employment prac...
Read More >