25Jun
Swire v Secretary of State [2020]: A cautionary tale for applicants seeking screening directions
A recent High Court ruling in the case of R (Swire) v Secretary of State [2020] has highlighted the subtleties in the approach to screening decisions and particularly in the assessment of measures to mitigate the adverse effects of a proposed development, in cases where negative screening opinions are given. Environmental Impact Assessments (“EIAs”) have long been a fertile area for legal challenge to planning permissions due to the complexities and subtleties of the EIA regime....
By:
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Related
On October 11, 2019, Pepper Hamilton will host an interactive seminar entitled “The Art of Internat...
Read More >
New York Governor Andrew Cuomo has signed into law amendments to the New York State Human Rights Law...
Read More >
Today, the U.S. Department of Labor finally announced its long-awaited changes to the regulations re...
Read More >
Retirement plan administrators can run into issues with uncashed distribution checks, most often whe...
Read More >
Congress recently passed the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement Act (SECURE Act, ...
Read More >
2019 saw courts issue several significant decisions that have implications for employers nationwide ...
Read More >