25Jun
Swire v Secretary of State [2020]: A cautionary tale for applicants seeking screening directions
A recent High Court ruling in the case of R (Swire) v Secretary of State [2020] has highlighted the subtleties in the approach to screening decisions and particularly in the assessment of measures to mitigate the adverse effects of a proposed development, in cases where negative screening opinions are given. Environmental Impact Assessments (“EIAs”) have long been a fertile area for legal challenge to planning permissions due to the complexities and subtleties of the EIA regime....
By:
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Related
At the end of 2019, Dutch department store chain HEMA announced it was going to stop using fingerpri...
Read More >
If you’re seeking a special permit for a project, be prepared to prove that your proposal complies ...
Read More >
Prior to July 2nd, New Jersey’s Medical Cannabis Act lacked protections for employees’ off-duty me...
Read More >
Employers must understand what they can and cannot do now that the Social Security Administration (S...
Read More >
Key Takeaways - The European Commission has adopted a White Paper with proposals for sweeping enfor...
Read More >
The National Labor Relations Board recently held that a group of employees who were advocating on be...
Read More >