X
02Aug

July 2019: Appellate Practice Update

New Supreme Court Precedent on “Substantial Evidence” Standard of Review On April 1, 2019, the Supreme Court decided a case providing a detailed explanation of the meaning of “substantial evidence” when applying that standard of review. In Biestek v....
By: Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/july-2019-appellate-practice-update-52122/

Related

Planning for an M&A Transaction: Key commercial terms to look-out for

When participating in an M&A process involving a video game company, whether you are on the sell-sid...

Read More >

‘Healthy’ Coconut Oil Suit Settles for $1.85M

To settle a false advertising class action over its “healthy” claims for coconut oil, Nature’s Wa...

Read More >

Utilizing CPLR 3102(c) Pre-Action Discovery in the Article 78 Proceedings – Can’t Go Fishin’

Last February, in Dreyer v Stachecki, 2020 NY Slip Op 50134(U), the Suffolk County Supreme Court den...

Read More >

Minneapolis Enacts ‘Wage Theft Prevention Ordinance’ On Heels Of Minnesota’s Wage Theft Legislation

On January 1, 2020, the newly passed Wage Theft Prevention Ordinance will go into effect in the City...

Read More >

[Video] 6 Key Takeaways | National Labor Relations Board Issues New Final Rule on Joint Employers

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB/Board) recently issued a new rule effectively overturning a...

Read More >

‘Vague’ Savings Clause Insufficient To Save Arbitration Agreement Limiting Employees’ Access To NLRB

An arbitration agreement requiring that all “claims or controversies in any way relating to or asso...

Read More >