25Jul
Just (Don’t) Do It: Oregon Supreme Court Warns Against Cat’s Paw Retaliation
The Oregon Supreme Court just revived a whistleblower retaliation claim filed against sportswear giant Nike by adopting for the first time a novel legal concept known as the “cat’s paw” theory. The July 18 opinion opens new avenues for employees to...
By:
Fisher Phillips
Related
The United States Supreme Court recently denied petitions to consider two U.S. Court of Appeals deci...
Read More >
• Following the financial crisis, nonbank lenders looking to carve out new, profitable niches—espe...
Read More >
The recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision in Frederick Hsu Living Trust v. ODN Holding Corporat...
Read More >
The US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently extracted a $3.5 million civil penalty from two compa...
Read More >
As previously reported in this Cooley PubCo post, on May 21, the SEC adopted final amendments to the...
Read More >
At the same time as it issued its notice of proposed rulemaking expanding the definition of “person...
Read More >