25Jul
Just (Don’t) Do It: Oregon Supreme Court Warns Against Cat’s Paw Retaliation
The Oregon Supreme Court just revived a whistleblower retaliation claim filed against sportswear giant Nike by adopting for the first time a novel legal concept known as the “cat’s paw” theory. The July 18 opinion opens new avenues for employees to...
By:
Fisher Phillips
Related
In a significant victory for California employers who use arbitration agreements, the California Sup...
Read More >
Congress recently passed the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement Act of 2019 (the ...
Read More >
1. Non-Competition Agreements Prohibited for Low Wage Earners in Maryland - Maryland law prohibits ...
Read More >
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of race, ...
Read More >
A recent decision by the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT), Tobii AB (publ) v. Competition and Marke...
Read More >
“Anything you can do, I can do better.” That’s essentially the sentiment floating around Albany t...
Read More >