07Apr
Surveying the Law, Chancery Declines to Dismiss a Claim that a 35% Holder was the Controlling Stockholder of the Acquirer (as Well as the Target)
Voigt v Metcalf, C.A. No. 2018-0828-JTL (Del. Ch. Feb. 10, 2020). This decision contains an instructive review of the factors the Court of Chancery will examine to determine whether a minority stockholder may in fact be a controlling stockholder in...
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
In just a few weeks, I’ll be speaking at the CBIA’s Employment Law Conference on the topic of “Ar...
Read More >
The Rhode Island Supreme Court recently held that the Airline Deregulation Act (ADA), a federal law,...
Read More >
Beginning in 2020, Nevada employers can no longer refuse to hire a job applicant for failing a preem...
Read More >
Despite the heightened attention to avoiding and addressing sexual harassment claims in the wake of ...
Read More >
Most developers are familiar with the notion that under California’s Subdivision Map Act, the vesti...
Read More >
The City and County of San Francisco (SF) issued a COVID-19 surge-related travel and quarantine orde...
Read More >