07Apr
Surveying the Law, Chancery Declines to Dismiss a Claim that a 35% Holder was the Controlling Stockholder of the Acquirer (as Well as the Target)
Voigt v Metcalf, C.A. No. 2018-0828-JTL (Del. Ch. Feb. 10, 2020). This decision contains an instructive review of the factors the Court of Chancery will examine to determine whether a minority stockholder may in fact be a controlling stockholder in...
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
In Brinker Rest. Corp. v. Superior Court (Cal. 2012) 273 P.3d 513, the California Supreme Court expl...
Read More >
Talks between General Motors and the striking UAW broke down yesterday, threatening the progress the...
Read More >
The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”) has now released for public com...
Read More >
In a case of first impression, a divided panel of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or Board)...
Read More >
In Bigger v. Facebook, Inc., the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that courts should...
Read More >
The COVID-19 crisis portends a new and troubling outlook for construction contractors and other empl...
Read More >