07Apr
Surveying the Law, Chancery Declines to Dismiss a Claim that a 35% Holder was the Controlling Stockholder of the Acquirer (as Well as the Target)
Voigt v Metcalf, C.A. No. 2018-0828-JTL (Del. Ch. Feb. 10, 2020). This decision contains an instructive review of the factors the Court of Chancery will examine to determine whether a minority stockholder may in fact be a controlling stockholder in...
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
In this matter, plaintiff Marisco Ltd. hired defendant GL Engineering & Construction (GL E&C) to con...
Read More >
A recent decision by the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT), Tobii AB (publ) v. Competition and Marke...
Read More >
COVID-19 has made its way into various industries throughout the world, and Pennsylvania’s construc...
Read More >
Several years ago, a trend was emerging that consisted of third-party, private marketplaces where em...
Read More >
Under Arizona law, when a purchaser of a new residential dwelling unit alleges a construction defect...
Read More >
In December, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued a flurry of employer-friendly decision...
Read More >