07Apr
Surveying the Law, Chancery Declines to Dismiss a Claim that a 35% Holder was the Controlling Stockholder of the Acquirer (as Well as the Target)
Voigt v Metcalf, C.A. No. 2018-0828-JTL (Del. Ch. Feb. 10, 2020). This decision contains an instructive review of the factors the Court of Chancery will examine to determine whether a minority stockholder may in fact be a controlling stockholder in...
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
It's the end of the year and while everyone is busy, employers in California should be aware of new ...
Read More >
In Fort Bend County, Texas v. Davis, the Supreme Court of the United States held that the requiremen...
Read More >
In hotly anticipated comments on Thursday—and yes, such a designation applies to a speech on moneta...
Read More >
U.S. immigration law is a complicated legal area that requires the services of exceptional employmen...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: In Toomey v. U of Arizona, No. 19-35 (D. Ar. June 24, 2019), the Magistrate Judg...
Read More >
Healthcare Provider Fired Jehovah's Witness for Request to Skip Party, Federal Agency Charges - NE...
Read More >